查看: 20|回复: 0

【结构设计】《INDEX Architecture》浏览笔记

[复制链接]

2854

主题

211

回帖

1171

积分

版主

积分
1171
发表于 2026-5-25 15:23:48 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
实践中,[贴000] 注:根据 本当无人、Spade、毛石三位兄长的建议,帖子已陆续修改。
*总说明 单贴结构: [贴xxx]:帖子编号,按时间顺序,避免与大家回复的帖子混淆 [key word]:该贴关键词,每贴只谈一项 [原文+笔记]:在原文中穿插概要、联想、疑问、个人观点等等 [cross-reference]:原文末尾的交叉索引 连贴结构: 参照该书的cross-reference(本贴[笔记002]中有解释)结构,以本人的兴趣和倾向来选择其中一些。
如果帖子能进行到底,可以猜想最后所有的关键词都已经出现过了。
=========================================================== 关于书 INDEX Architecture : A Columbia Architecture Book (D, Columbia Documents of Architecture and Theory, V. 7-9) by Bernard Tschumi (Editor), Matthew Berman (Editor) Product Details Paperback: 315 pages Publisher: The MIT Press; 1st Mit Pr edition (May 1, 2003) ISBN: 0262700956 Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 7.4 x 0.8 inches Review [原文]"Tschumi himself appears in the alphabetical sequence, and his sayings are always dynamic and serious." -- Robert Maxwell, TLS [笔记]Robert Maxwell的意思是Tschumi自编自演,挺神。
[原文]INDEX Architecture documents the extensive cross-fertilization of ideas that can occur between architectural practice and education. Through work developed by students and faculty at Columbia University's School of Architecture, it offers not only an archive of avant-garde work but a record of architectural discourse at a time when the design studio has been radically altered by digital technology. Writings, interviews, and images are organized according to an alphabetical "index" of key terms. Cross-referencing allows for a rich reading of concepts currently discussed in the field. [笔记]INDEX Architecture基于Columbia University's School of Architecture的教学和工作,将关于“关键词”的“讨论”按照首字母顺序编排,形成一本“模拟”的“建筑词典”。
加之并存的“交叉引用”(Cross-referencing),两种信息组织结构大大提升该书的可读性和学术价值。
这本书其实是用indexed(主要结构是alphabetical和cross-referencing) terms来对Columbia University's School of Architecture的教学工作及理论进行represent。
Cross-referencing:这是该书平行于alphabetical(首字母排序)的另一个编排结构,每读完一个term时,你可以从紧跟其后的cross-reference来引导你去读提示term的部分。


---
补充:
[贴001] [keyword] aesthetics / appearance [原文] question:Is the aesthetic an a priori condition of formal development? GRE
canonrevival wrote: [原文] If the work has rigor,the questions that it raises are valid questions regardless of whether or

相关讨论:
1. 构件选型时安全性和经济性之间的平衡点怎么把握?计算假定和实际受力状态之间有哪些差异需考虑?
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关注公众号

相关侵权、举报、投诉及建议等,请发 E-mail:admin@archask.com

Powered by Discuz! X5.0 © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.|蜀ICP备20022646号

在本版发帖
会员粉丝群
返回顶部